Players Like...

❤ Detailed Resource Management

Players must carefully allocate a limited budget as the blue team, investing in various cybersecurity measures like firewalls, network segmentation, security awareness training, and incident response. Conversely, the red team has a finite number of "action points" to spend on reconnaissance, vulnerability research, and exploitation attempts. Balancing these constrained resources is a core strategic challenge for both sides.

❤ Turn-Based Tactical Decisions

The game progresses in a turn-based format, with each side taking turns selecting their actions. This allows players to thoughtfully consider their next moves and potential consequences, rather than requiring real-time reactions. However, the turns are timed, adding an element of pressure and forcing players to make decisions quickly.

❤ Illustrating Cybersecurity Concepts

Rather than simulating technical hacking or security tools, the gameplay directly maps to real-world cybersecurity activities. Red team players can choose actions like reconnaissance, vulnerability research, and exploitation, while the blue team can implement policies, segment networks, and train employees. This allows players to experience how these concepts interact in a strategic context.

❤ Replayable and Customizable Scenarios

Each gameplay session can unfold differently based on the choices made by the players. Furthermore, the game offers configurable settings, enabling players to adjust parameters like network topology, budget constraints, and victory conditions. This variety encourages replayability and helps create diverse gameplay experiences.

❤ Responsive to Community Feedback

The developers have emphasized their collaboration with the cybersecurity community during the game's creation, and they continue to solicit player feedback to guide ongoing improvements. This suggests the gameplay will likely evolve and be refined over time, further enhancing the experience for players.